-
Grow Strong, Live Long
-
-
Fitness Study with Elderly Retirement Home Independent Living
Residents - Part 3
-
- Robert
Simons, Ph.D., CHES, MS
-
-
Results
-
-
Results of the exercise training
programs were determined by analyzing the subjects' changes in functional
ability, muscle strength, joint flexibility, and health knowledge. Post-testing
took place precisely 16 weeks after the pre-testing.
-
Functional Ability
The
subjects' functional abilities were assessed by means of the AAHPERD Functional
Fitness Assessment for Adults Over the Age of 60 Years, which included a)
Ponderal Index, b) Flexibility, c) Endurance (cardiovascular) 880-yard walk, d)
Strength test, e) Coordination test, and the f) Agility test. The strength group
far surpassed the results of either other group.
The
strength groups analysis of results revealed an average improvement of 33% in
strength, an 18% improvement in coordination, a 14% improvement in agility, a 7%
increase in endurance, a 10% increase in flexibility, and a 1% improvement in
ponderal index.
The cardiovascular/walking groups
results indicated this group on the average became 11% more flexible, 13% more
coordinated, 12% stronger, 6% better endurance, 9% more agile, and a 1%
improvement in ponderal index.
The control groups positive
results indicated this group on the average became 12% stronger, 13% more
coordinated, 2% more flexible, and a 1% improvement in ponderal index. However,
negative results also revealed a 21% reduction in agility, and a 6% reduction in
endurance. The functional ability results are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1. Functional Ability

Key: PICHG- Ponderal Index change, FLEXCHG-Flexibility
change, CORDCHG-Coordination change, STRCHG-Strength change, ENDCHG-Endurance
change, ABCHG-Agility Balance change, HTCHG-Health Test change
Table 2.
Mean changes in functional ability measures
over the 16-week training period for the Strength (N=21) and Walking Group
(N=18).
|
Functional Parameter
|
Pre-Training
|
- Post-Training
|
- Difference
|
- % Change
|
|
Functional Strength
|
14.57/15.89
|
- 17.71/17.67
|
- 3.14/1.78
|
- * 22/11%
|
|
Functional Flexibility
|
17.86/18.58
|
- 19.49/20.18
|
- 1.63/1.60
|
- *9/9%
|
|
Functional Coordination
|
16.97/14.93
|
- 12.67/12.74
|
- 4.30/2.19
|
- *25/15%
|
|
Functional Endurance
|
14.89/14.64
|
- 13.28/13.06
|
- 1.61/1.58
|
- *11/11%
|
|
Functional Agility
|
50.79/49.24
|
- 41.41/44.75
|
- 9.38/4.49
|
- *18/9%
|
- *Statistically significant
difference (p<0.05)
-
Muscle
Strength
Both body strength and upper body
strength improved as a result of the 16-week training program for both the
strength and Cardiovascular/walking groups. These were measured by comparing the
pre and post Keiser strength machine one-repetition maximum test scores.
As shown in Table 3 for the Strength
Group, the strength group subjects' mean 1RM leg extension increased 18.57
pounds from 29.76 to 48.33 pounds, the subjects' mean 1RM leg curl increased
16.00 pounds from 45.24 to 61.24 pounds. Their mean 1RM leg press increased
30.48 pounds, from 183.81 to 214.29 pounds.
Table 3.
Mean changes for the strength group in lower
body strength and upper body strength over the 16-week strength training
period.(N=21).
|
Parameter
|
Pre-Training
|
- Post-Training
|
- Difference
|
- % Change
|
|
Leg Extension
|
29.76
|
- 48.33
|
- 18.57
|
- *62% (1RM)
|
|
Leg Curl
|
45.24
|
- 61.24
|
- 16.00
|
- *35% (1RM)
|
|
Leg Press
|
183.81
|
- 214.29
|
- 30.48
|
- *17% (1RM)
|
|
Upper Back
|
48.10
|
- 55.86
|
- 7.76
|
- *16% (1RM)
|
|
Chest Press
|
32.14
|
41.62
|
9.48
|
*29% (1RM)
|
|
Lower Back
|
55.24
|
- 65.58
|
- 10.34
|
- *19% (1RM)
|
*Statistically significant difference
(p<0.05).
Table 4.
Mean changes for the Cardiovascular/walking
group in lower body strength and upper body strength over the 16-week strength
training period.(N=18).
|
Parameter
|
Pre-Training
|
- Post-Training
|
- Difference
|
- % Change
|
|
Leg Extension
|
37.50
|
- 47.06
|
- 9.56
|
- *25% (1RM)
|
|
Leg Curl
|
51.67
|
- 61.28
|
- 9.61
|
- *19 % (1RM)
|
|
Leg Press
|
176.11
|
- 191.39
|
- 15.28
|
- *9% (1RM)
|
|
Upper Back
|
45.00
|
- 54.17
|
- 9.17
|
- *20% (1RM)
|
|
Chest Press
|
28.06
|
37.22
|
9.16
|
*33% (1RM)
|
|
Lower Back
|
50.83
|
- 61.11
|
- 10.28
|
- *20% (1RM)
|
- *Statistically significant difference
(p<0.05).
-
Joint Flexibility
All joint flexibility measures improved over the 16-week
training period. The exercise group subjects increased their shoulder abduction
by an average of 11.1 degrees (8.62 and 13.62 degrees), and their hip flexion by
an average of 3.45 degrees (4.85 to 2.05 degrees). The joint flexibility
changes are presented in Table 5.
Table 5.
Mean changes in flexibility measured for the
Strength group (N=21), as compared to the control group(N=21), at the shoulder
joint and hip joint (seated) over the 16-week training period.
|
Parameter
|
Pre-Training
|
- Post-Training
|
- Difference
|
- % Change
|
|
Shoulder Abduction
|
144.43/152.05
|
- 153.05/138.43
|
- 8.62/-13.62
|
- 6%/-9%
|
|
Shoulder Flexion
|
142.00/146.90
|
- 151.86/140.67
|
- 9.86/-6.23
|
- 7%/-4%
|
|
Hip Flexion
|
102.67/103.10
|
- 107.52/101.05
|
- 4.85/-2.05
|
- 5%/-2%
|
- *Statistically significant difference
(P<0.05).
-
Health
Knowledge
All participants were administered the same
written examination before and after the health series lecture intervention. All
three groups similarly improved their health knowledge test scores. The strength
group scores, on the average improved by 13%, the walking group by 15%, and the
control group by 16%, for an overall average of approximately 15%. This
improvement was statistically significant, especially when you consider that 15%
represents an improvement of over 8 correct questions on a 55-question test. The
health benefit attained with this increased health knowledge is intangible at
this time, but could be expected to pay dividends in the future.
-
Quality of life, social inter-activeness,
energy levels, as well as strength and functional ability status soared through
the roof in just sixteen short weeks! The abstract psychosocial and
psychological benefits were tremendous and were repeatedly acknowledged by the
researcher during the majority of the post study consultations with the exercise
group participants. The enhanced mood-state, social inter-activeness, and
individual energy levels, were perhaps the greatest success of the fitness
study. Some of these views will be provided at the end of this review. The
health gains were so apparent in the exercise groups in the second half of the
study that the control group and other Fountains residents not involved in the
study were begging to begin another fitness study so they could begin their
exercise programs. A phase two similar study is planned to commence soon, with
great support of all involved, residents, families, and staff alike. The next
study will combine the benefits of several modes of physical activity and
exercise.
-
Discussion
The physician-cleared residents who
participated in fitness study were mostly non-ambulatory individuals who
initially required considerable encouragement to participate in a study that
they perceived as possibly harmful to themselves. Nonetheless, after the pretesting and introductory exercise sessions (for the exercise groups), they
followed the designed exercise training protocols with diligence and a sense of
commitment. A significant percentage of each group was unable to complete
successfully some aspect of pre-testing, such as the 880-yard endurance walk or
the agility test. Some members of the strength-training group had to be assisted
on and off the Keiser strength machines, and some members of the walking group
had to either sit and rest during their assigned walks or had to utilize a cane
or walker to complete it (which for some, constituted a near maximal upper and
lower body workout). All participants were encouraged to put forth their best
effort, but never pushed beyond their individual capabilities.
The strength group, that is, performed one
set of each exercise with a resistance/weight load that produced momentary
muscle fatigue within 8 to 10 controlled repetitions. This required a relatively
high exercise effort, as 8 to 10 repetitions to fatigue represents about 75
percent of maximum resistance.
Because there were no injuries associated
with the strength training exercise program, it appears that standard strength
training procedures are well tolerated by elderly retirement home residents.
There was one injury during a walk from one participant in the walking group.
This individual recovered well and resumed the program after a short convalesce.
Unrelated to the exercise program, two individuals experienced unrelated
illnesses during the course of the study that forced them to discontinue
training. Two study participants dropped out due to personal reasons. The 39
subjects who completed the 16-week exercise training programs reported that is
was a very positive experience and planned to continue their exercise sessions.
According to the lead trainer, residents liked the challenge of serious strength
training and saw much more improvement than they anticipated.
The six training exercises were selected
specifically for non-ambulatory retirement home residents for the following
reasons. The Leg Press machine involves the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteus maximus muscles used for moving between seated and standing positions, such as
getting in and out of chairs or bed. Strengthening
these large corps stability muscles should therefore improve the residents'
ability to lift and lower their bodies. Because these muscles are also essential
for standing and walking, the leg press is the foundational exercise in our
strength-training program. It is noted that the Keiser leg press exercise is
performed with the torso fully supported and at a right angle to the line of
force through the legs. This prevents resistance loading on the spinal column,
which could be contraindicated for frail, elderly individuals.
The Keiser Chest Press machine targets the
upper body pushing muscles, namely the triceps, pectoralis major, and anterior
deltoid. These muscles are used in conjunction with the legs when rising from a
chair or bed. Seniors typically lean forward, place their hands on the chair
armrests, and push hard as they attempt to stand. Of course, they use these same
muscles to control their lowering movement when getting back into a chair or
bed.
Because it is important to attain balanced
muscle development, our remaining 4 exercises were machines supplemented these
strength functions. These exercises addressed the upper body pulling muscles (latisumus
dorsi, teres major, biceps, and posterior deltoids), as well as the shoulder
retraction muscles of the upper back (rhomboids and middle trapezius). An
intended outcome of these exercises was improved breathing through better
posture, reduced round-shoulderness, and learned adherence to the exercise
breathing protocol. Other group participants, community staff members, as well
as resident family members noticed the improved posture of the strength group
participants. These observations were recorded early in the study and persisted
throughout the duration of the 16 weeks.
According to the instructional staff, the
six resistance exercises were relatively easy for the subjects to learn and
perform. With only six minutes of actual exercise time, most of the strength
group participants were able to do the strength-training program without
assistance. Some strength group participants needed continued assistance in
adjusting the seats and digital resistance device, due to eyesight challenges.
Although transition time between exercises increased the session duration to 20
minutes for some subjects, the training program required a relatively small time
commitment.
Training intensity appears to be the
critical factor for stimulating strength development, as one set of 10
repetitions to momentary muscle fatigue produced significant strength gains in
the program participants. A demand must be placed on the musculature for
adaptation to take place. The 62%, 35%, , and the 17% increase in three leg 1RM
represented an overall 38% percent
increase in lower body strength, and the 16%, 29%, and 19% increase in upper
body 1RM represented a 21.3% percent
increase in upper body strength. The practical result for most residents in the
strength-training group was improved mobility, ease in sitting down and standing
up from chairs, and for several residents the ability to ambulate without a
walker or even a cane.
Although the exercise subjects did not
perform stretching exercises during the course of the study, their joint
flexibility improved significantly in both upper body and lower body sites. The
full-range of motion strength training instructed, it is believed, was
responsible for increasing shoulder abduction by about 10 percent and hip
flexion by about 50 percent. For retirement home patients with limited mobility,
enhanced range of joint movement and strength can have important practical
applications in the performance of daily tasks, such as putting on and taking
off shoes and clothing. The majority of strength group participants noted this
improvement.
These results speak for themselves,
however, in a comparison of change per group the results are quite revealing.
For example, in the comparison of change from the beginning of the study to the
end, the strength training group had increases of the following over the control
group:
-
338%
Endurance improvement
-
312%
Strength improvement
-
307%
Flexibility improvement
-
210%
Agility and balance improvement
-
104%
Coordination improvement
In the comparison of change from the
beginning to the end, the walking training group had increases over the control
group, as follows:
-
333%
Endurance improvement
-
133%
Strength improvement
-
303%
Flexibility improvement
-
153%
Agility and balance improvement
In the areas of endurance, flexibility, and
strength improvements of the strength group, these figures represent an
improvement over the control group of over three times (3X). And for the walking
group, increases in endurance and flexibility, were also three times as great.
It was most encouraging to see elderly
residents improve their body composition, increase their muscle strength,
increase their energy levels, and enhance their joint flexibility.
-
These physiological changes become more
relevant if they result in greater functional capacity and personal independence
in performing activities of daily living.
-
Financial
The significantly higher functional ability scores attained by
the exercising residents after the 16-week strength and cardiovascular training
program was therefore an important finding. The increase represented
approximately a 14 and 9 percent improvement in functional independence,
respectively for the strength and walking groups. In a retirement home setting,
this clearly indicates considerably less need for caregiver assistance.
-
While this is good news for both the
senior residents and retirement community staff, a higher functional ability
also has financial benefits. It is estimated that every percentage point
increase in a resident's functional ability reduces cost of care by 50 cents a
day. A 14% functional ability gain therefore represents a cost of care reduction
of $7.00 per day. Multiplying this by the 21 subjects in the strength-training
group, we get a daily cost of care reduction of $147.00. On a yearly basis, this
represents a savings of $53,655. Because the strength training equipment costs a
fraction of this amount, the program would appear to provide desirable financial
dividends. Of course, if 100 residents were involved in the strength-training
program, the annual cost of care reduction could easily exceed $255,000. The
walking groups gains represented a savings of $29,565. Factors directly
derived from the exercise training such as, maintaining autonomous, independent
living, and delaying assisted living care would be hard to calculate, however,
would also be very costly to the individual. As far as individual costs, this
would be the most significant savings.
-
Falls
Another indicator of improved functional capacity was
incidence of falls, which decreased by 61 percent. Recorded and reported
falls for six month periods for the entire group went from 31 to 19 falls. All
of these factors taken together attest to the practical benefits of the basic
fitness training program, especially strength training.
Because this was one of the first
studies conducted to examine functional benefits of exercise, both strength
training and cardiovascular training, in a large retirement home facility, we
interviewed several of the staff and a few of the participants to ascertain
their perceptions of the fitness training program. The following information was
obtained from one-on-one interviews with the lead researcher after the study
concluded.
- Peter Brooks
- Executive Director, The Fountains
at Boca Ciega Bay
-
-
Peter
Brooks was extremely pleased with the residents' progress, especially their
improved functional capacity for the activities of daily living and state of
mind. According to Peter Brooks, the study participants exhibited much better
physical mobility, energy levels, mental fitness, posture, more endurance, and
less pain. What was most gratifying about the outcome of the study in Peters
words was that is was very apparent that the quality of life of all involved
improved tremendously. We never expected the results to be so significant. To
compare the changes of abilities noted in the study from 338% to 210% in the
strength group and from 333% to 133% in the walking group, was beyond our
wildest dreams. We have established a precedent here at the Fountains and will
continue to ride the wave of innovative fitness thinking!
-
Summary of On-Site
Feedback
-
Personnel and Residents
-
-
All of the staff and participant interviews
indicated a high level of satisfaction with the exercise programs, especially
the strength-training program. The consensus was that the strength exercises
were easy to learn, satisfying to perform, and productive from a performance
perspective. Everyone agreed that the strength-training program was both safe
and effective, and that it produced positive outcomes in addition to improved
physical fitness and functional capacity. It was also noted that the entire
facility couldnt wait to begin the next study that will include an exercise
group that will combine strength training and walking.
-
Conclusion
It is a simple, successful, and
time-efficient program that provides an excellent model for training older
adults. It incorporated a strength, as well as a cardiovascular/walking program,
with the strength training program outperforming the later.
However, there are other proven strength training programs for the
elderly, such as the Tufts University model used in numerous research studies.
Regardless of the training protocol utilized, the important point is that
sensible and supervised strength exercise should be provided to residents in
retirement centers. In a very real sense, these are the individuals who can
benefit most from more muscle strength. While one is never too old to begin
strength training, it is certainly advantageous to start sooner rather than
later. We therefore recommend that independent living facilities also make
well-designed strength training programs available to all residents. In addition
to improving the participants' functional capacity, such programs should be
instrumental in reducing health care costs, thereby benefiting society in
general.
Based on the results of our 16-week fitness
study at the Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay, we conclude that a basic program of
progressive resistance exercise may be a safe and effective means for enabling
elderly adults to attain:
-
Increased muscle strength,
-
Improved balance and stability
-
Improved body composition,
-
Enhanced joint flexibility,
-
Increased functional capacity,
-
Improved mobility,
-
Enhanced Mood state
-
Increased social interaction
Based on firsthand reports from medical
staff and residents at the Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay, we further conclude that
a supervised strength training program may be related to:
-
Increased potential for resident
independence,
-
Improved cooperation between care givers,
staff and residents,
-
Improved cooperation among physical
therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, and recreation
specialists,
-
Enhanced potential for recruiting new
residents,
-
Enhanced potential for recruiting new
professional staff,
-
Reduced
health care costs.
PART 1
PART 2
The
author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to the Executive Director of
the
Fountains at Boca Ciega Bay, Mr. Peter Brooks and all the
administrators, professional staff, and residents whose leadership,
cooperation, and participation made this study a tremendous success. Without the
extraordinary vision and sincere desire of Mr Peter Brooks for the improvement
in quality of life for so many residents this fitness study would not have been
possible. The author also wishes to acknowledge the valuable assistance provided
by Katherine Donigan, Susan Wright, and Tammy Makinen.
Article Index
|