|
|
-
Strength Training:
-
How Long? How Often?
Research
on exercise options for busy people shows that much can be accomplished
in 2 days vs. 3 days, and 20 minutes vs. 60 minutes.
Wayne L. Westcott, PHD, CSCS
Research indicates that about 75 percent of American adults do not
exercise and are overweight. While most people understand that lack of
exercise can lead to fat accumulation, they typically are unaware of the
physiological relationships that link inactivity and weight gain.
In
addition to using fewer calories, inactive adults lose between one-half
and one pound of muscle per year. This results in a lower resting
metabolism that further reduces the calories utilized on a daily basis. Due to few calories being expended, even eating the same quantity of
food causes weight gain. Dieting is largely unsuccessful because it
generally results in more muscle loss and an even lower metabolic rate.
People need to understand that, for the most part, the problem of too
much weight is really a problem of too little exercise. More than that,
however, an exercise program must include strength training to replace
muscle and restore resting metabolic rate.
The
importance of strength training is illustrated in a study at Tufts
University. After three months of basic strength exercise, the senior
subjects added 3 pounds of lean (muscle) weight, lost 4 pounds of fat
weight, raised their resting metabolism by 7 percent and increased their
daily calorie intake by 15 percent.
But
how much strength training is necessary, and how much time must be
allotted for the overall exercise program? Because the majority of
non-exercisers cite lack of time as their main reason
for remaining inactive, a time-efficient training program would appear
to be advantageous.
-
Most people in the fitness field consider a three-day-per-week, onehour-per-session exercise program standard for making significant
improvements in body composition. The hour training session is
typically divided into about 25 minutes of endurance exercise, 25
minutes of strength exercise and five minutes each of warm-up and
cool-down activities. But studies show that a program consisting of less
time can be almost as beneficial.
-
Two vs. Three Days Per Week
In
a large research study, 716 previously inactive adults who performed 25
minutes of endurance exercise, 25 minutes of strength exercise and five
minutes each of warm-up and cool-down activities three days a week for
eight weeks experienced a 2.2 percent improvement in body composition. As shown in Table 1, they lost 4.6 pounds of fat weight and gained 2.5
pounds of lean (muscle) weight.
-
In
the same study, 416 previously sedentary men and women performed the
identical exercise protocol, but trained only two days a week. After
eight weeks, they experienced a 2.0 percent improvement in body
composition. As presented in Table 1, these participants lost 4.0
pounds of fat weight and added 2.2 pounds of lean (muscle) weight.
-
-
Table 1:
-
2
Vs. 3 Days
|
Changes in
body composition for 2 days / week and 3 days / week exercisers |
-
-
8 Week Changes
-
-
Percent
fat
-
Fat weight
-
Lean weight
|
-
-
2 Days / Week
-
(n
= 416)
-
-2.0%
-
-4.0 lbs
-
+2.2 lbs
|
-
-
3 Days / Week
-
(n = 716)
-
-2.2%
-
-4.6 lbs
-
+2.5 lbs
|
On
average, the subjects who trained two days per week made 88 percent as
much improvement in their body composition parameters as those who
exercised three days per week. It would therefore appear that training
only twice a week is effective for making significant changes in fat
weight and lean weight in previously inactive adults.
-
From a practical perspective, it is noteworthy that the two training
days in this study were Tuesdays and Thursdays. In most fitness
facilities, Tuesdays and Thursdays are less crowded than Mondays,
Wednesdays, and Fridays, which is advantageous for attending to
beginning participants.
-
20 minutes vs. 60 minutes
A
study of 59 previously sedentary participants was conducted to determine
whether 20-minute exercise periods were sufficient for improving body
composition and physical fitness. Each session included 15 minutes of
endurance exercise and five minutes of strength training. The aerobic
activity was either stationary cycling or stepping, and a typical
strength workout was one set of leg presses (quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteals), one set of bench presses (pectoralis major, deltoids,
triceps) and one set of seated rows (latissimus dorsi, biceps).
After eight weeks of training, the previously inactive men and women
improved their body composition by 2 percent, losing 4 pounds of fat
weight and adding 2 pounds of lean (muscle) weight. They also increased
their muscle strength by 23 percent and improved their cardiovascular
endurance by 12 percent. These findings indicate that relatively brief
exercise sessions can be effective for improving both body composition
and physical fitness in formerly sedentary adults. In fact, the changes
in fat weight and lean weight for the 20-minute-per-session exercisers
in this study and the 60-minute-per-session exercisers in the previously
presented study were quite similar.
-
Table 2:
-
20-min. Sessions
-
- Changes in
Body Composition and Physical Fitness
- for 20-minute Session
Exercisers and Non-exercisers
|
-
-
8 Week Changes
-
-
Percent
fat
-
Fat weight
-
Lean weight
-
Muscle strength
-
Cardiovascular
endurance
|
-
-
20 Min. Sessions
-
(n
= 59)
-
-2.0%
-
-4.0 lbs
-
+2.0 lbs
-
+23%
-
+12%
|
-
-
No Exercise
-
(n = 8)
-
0%
-
0
lbs
-
0
lbs
-
+3%
-
+3%
|
-
Understanding Study Results
Do
these results imply that training periods longer than 20 minutes are
unnecessary? Not at all. However, they do suggest that unfit
individuals may need less exercise than they think to stimulate
desirable physical adaptations. While well-conditioned participants may
benefit from longer training sessions, those with low fitness levels may
have difficulty maintaining productive levels of exercise intensity for
extended periods. Therefore, 20-minute workouts may be worth trying
with people who are unaccustomed to physical activity.
Because lack of time is the most frequently stated reason for not
exercising, the results of these studies are good news for
time-pressured men and women. For those who dont like to exercise but
understand the need to do so, the 20-minute training session should
enhance their workout compliance.
The
Surgeon Generals recommendation for 30 minutes of physical activity
most days of the week is certainly a step in the right direction. However, adding some strength training should be beneficial for
replacing muscle and increasing metabolic rate, which appear to be key
factors in attaining and maintaining desirable body composition. Because a few multiple-muscle strength exercises seem to be sufficient,
a three- to five-station strength circuit may be an attractive facility
feature for time-pressured individuals. Table 3 presents a sample
five-station strength training circuit that should take no more than 10
minutes for completion.
-
Table 3:
-
5-Station Circuit
|
Sample
5-station Strength Training Circuit |
-
-
Suggested Exercise
-
Leg press machine
-
Bench press machine
-
Seated row machine
-
Abdominal machine
-
Low back machine
|
-
-
Muscle Groups
-
Quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteals
-
Pectoralis major, deltoids, triceps
-
Latissimus dorsi, biceps
-
Rectus abdominis
-
Erector spinae
|
Article Index
|
|