- “Nothing is particularly hard
- if you divide it into small jobs”
-
-
-Henry Ford
IFPA Certified
Bodybuilding Instructor
This
is not only the BEST course ever prepared specifically for
bodybuilders; this is the ONLY course that covers the practical
as well as the scientific processes of gaining more muscle strength,
size and definition. This course is designed to be of tremendous
benefit, not only for elite level professionals, but for the
recreational bodybuilder who is just starting-out. This course will
provide in depth knowledge of the science and practice of strength
training for all levels: beginners through World-Champion. Regardless
of whether you are interested in unlocking the secrets of optimal muscle
training for yourself, or you are a fitness professional interested in
gaining the most current, in depth knowledge and skill to design the
most effective, safest and serious strength training programs ever
created for maximizing your client’s muscular gains; the IFPA Certified
Bodybuilding Instructor course is a must have program for
you!
The
IFPA Certified Bodybuilding Instructor course is scheduled for release
on December 15th, 2004 for $599.00. This includes the two
textbooks: (1) Serious Strength Training, 2nd
Edition, 2003; Tudor O. Bompa, Phd; Mauro Dipasquale, M.D. and Lorenzo
J. Cornacchia. (2) Optimal Muscle Training, 2004, Dr. Ken
Kinakin. (3) the DVD Video: Optimal Muscle Training, 2004, Dr.
Kinakin (4) IFPA Certified Bodybuilding Instructor Workbook
(Specifically designed to enhance your study and maximize your learning
experience) (5) IFPA Certified Bodybuilding Instructor Exams (Two
Parts: Part I: Multiple Choice; Part II Short Answer/Essay). Upon
successfully passing the exams you will receive a (6) IFPA
Certified Bodybuilding Instructor Diploma (suitable for framing-so
display it with pride) (7) IFPA Certified Bodybuilding Instructor
Wallet Card and (8) Two year membership into the IFPA will all
rights and privileges including subscription to FitBits, FitNews and
more.
The IFPA is offering a pre-order
special until 12/15/04 of $200 off the price of the course, ($599 - $200
= $399) so if you order now you can save $200 off the price and pay
only $399.
-
-
Research on Repetition Ranges
-
- by Wayne L.
Westcott, PhD., C.S.C.S.
- and Rita La Rosa Loud, B.S.
According to the American College of Sports Medicine, aerobic activity
is necessary to improve cardiovascular endurance and anaerobic activity
is necessary to increase muscular strength. Although the recommended
duration for aerobic conditioning is relatively long (20 to 60 minutes),
no differentiation is discussed with respect to the physiological
adaptations. Essentially, we are told that properly performed aerobic
exercise anywhere within the prescribed time frame produces the same
outcome, namely greater cardiovascular endurance.
While
the recommended duration for anaerobic conditioning is relatively brief
(less than 90 seconds), different responses are typically proposed by
various professional organizations. For example, the American College
of Sports Medicine position stand on exercise prescription for muscular
strength and endurance is best developed by using lighter weights for a
greater number of repetitions.
The
National Strength and Conditioning Association suggests more specific
relationships between the number of repetitions performed and
physiological responses. In their periodization model, they propose
that shorter bouts of anaerobic training (2 to 4 repetitions) are best
for improving muscle power, moderate bouts of anaerobic training (5 to 6
repetitions) are best for building muscle strength, and longer bouts of
anaerobic training (8 to 12 repetitions) are best for increasing muscle
hypertrophy. A rough extrapolation of repetitions to time would
indicate the following corresponding categories: 10 to 30 seconds of
anaerobic exercise for muscle power; 30 to 50 seconds of anaerobic
exercise for muscle strength, and 50 to 90 seconds of anaerobic exercise
for muscle size. Although apparently arbitrary anaerobic
classifications have long been considered as general knowledge and
standard procedures by many professionals and textbook authors, there is
little research to support these claims.
Study One
To the
contrary, a recent study by Chestnut and Docherty found similar
neuromuscular adaptations for previously untrained men (mean age 24
years) training with 4 to 10 repetitions per set. In this study 10
subjects performed 6 sets of 4 repetitions, and 9 subjects completed 3
sets of 10 repetitions in the following core exercises: triceps bench
press, triceps pulley pressdown, barbell curl and dumbbell curl. After
10 weeks of training, 3 days per week, the subjects were assessed for
changes in 1 repetition maximum (1 RM) strength and muscle size
(cross-sectional area). According to the authors, the 4-repetition
training and the 10 repetition training elicited statistically
significant and equal increases in both muscle strength and muscle
size. In other words, the lower repetition training was not
better-suited for producing muscle strength and the higher repetition
training was not better-suited for increasing muscle size.
While
the authors did not report the repetition speed, it is assumed that all
sets (4 reps and 10 reps) were completed within the anaerobic energy
system (less than 90 seconds). This being the case, these results
indicate that shorter and longer bouts of anaerobic exercise produce
essentially the same physiological adaptations.
Study Two
We
have also conducted studies comparing lower and higher repetitions per
set. The first study, completed in 1991, examined the effects of
10-repetition training and 20-repetition training on muscle strength and
muscle endurance.
The
subjects in this study were 20 previously untrained men and women (mean
age 41 years), who performed one set of the following machine exercises,
three days per week, for a period of eight weeks: leg extension, leg
curl, chest press, pulldown, shoulder press, seated row, triceps
extension and biceps curl. All participants performed 10 leg extensions
and 10 leg curls using the heaviest weightload possible (20 RM) with
their right leg. Because each repetition was performed in four seconds,
the 10 RM set was completed in about 40 seconds and the 20 RM set was
completed in about 80 seconds.
The
results revealed statistically significant similar increases in muscle
strength (1 RM) and muscle endurance (reps with 50 percent of initial 1
RM weightload). More specifically, the 10 RM training produced a
7.6-pound increase in muscle strength and a 7.5-pound increase in muscle
strength and a 7.5-pound increase in muscle strength and a
7.5-repetition increase in muscle endurance.
These
findings indicated that 40-second and 80-second bouts of anaerobic
exercise produce essentially the same physiological changes with respect
to muscle strength and endurance. Like Chestnut and Docherty’s study,
we found no evidence of differentiated responses associated with lower
and higher repetition protocols when training to momentary muscle
fatigue within the anaerobic energy system parameters.
Study Three
During
the Winter of 2000, we conducted another study comparing lower and
higher repetitions on strength development. This study was designed to
replicate our previous research with preadolescents, in which13 to 15
repetitions proved more productive than six to eight repetitions for
improving both muscle strength and endurance. We concluded that higher
repetition training may be more effective for young boys and girls (mean
age 8 years) due to the greater motor learning effect.
The
subjects in our adult study were 44 previously untrained men and women
(mean age 53 years) who performed one set of the following machine
exercises, two or three days per week, for a period of ten weeks: leg
extension, leg curl, chest cross, chest press, pullover, lateral raise,
biceps curl, triceps extension, low back, abdominal, neck flexion and
neck extension. The 22 participants in the low-rep group completed six
to eight repetitions of each exercise, and the 22 participants in the
high-rep group completed 13 to 15 repetitions of each exercise. Because
each repetition was performed in six seconds, a 7 RM set required about
40 seconds and a 14 RM set required about 80 seconds.
The
results revealed statistically significant and similar strength gains (7
RM or 14 RM chest press). More specifically, the six to eight
repetition trainees made a 14.4-pound weightload increase, and the 13 to
15 repetition trainees made a 15.0-pound weightload increase.
Like
our previous adult study, these findings indicated that 40-second and
80-second bouts of anaerobic exercise have almost equal effects on
strength development. Like Chestnut and Docherty’s research, both of
our adult studies showed no difference in the physiological adaptations
associated with lower and higher repetition protocols, when training to
momentary muscle fatigue within the anaerobic energy system parameters.
Discussion
Many
strength professionals promote low repetitions with heavier weights for
maximizing muscle strength, and high repetitions with lighter weights
for developing muscle endurance. However, we are unaware of any research
that validates these assumptions. On the other hand, the studies
presented in this article showed similar responses in muscle strength,
muscle endurance, and muscle size from low-repetition and
high-repetition training.
Based
on these studies, it would appear that previously untrained adults
experience about the same muscular effects from low, medium and
high-repetition exercise sets that are completed within the anaerobic
energy system (less than 90 seconds).
It may
be true that people with a high percentage of fast twitch muscle fibers
make greater strength gains with low-repetition training. However, such
genetically gifted individuals comprise a very small segment of the
population.
In
general, most adults may strength train safely and successfully using a
wide range of repetitions (e.g., 4 to 20), per set. Based on our
professional experience and participant evaluations, we recommend 8 to
12 repetition training. This repetition range corresponds to about 70
to 80 percent of maximum resistance in most strength exercises.
In
conclusion, it would appear that training to muscle fatigue within the
anaerobic energy system is the essential stimulus for increasing muscle
strength, endurance and size, and that these responses are not
significantly influenced by low, medium, or high-repetition protocols.
|